Sex chat tasmania
As we now understand it, marriage is not merely the expression of a love people have for each other.
It is, or is intended as, a life-long union between two people who exemplify the biological duality of the human race, with the openness to welcoming children into the world.
It is crucial to notice that the proposed revision of marriage laws involves exactly that: a revision of marriage.
In order to offer the status of marriage to couples of the same sex, the very meaning of marriage has to be changed.
Could it be that if you haven't heard the case opposing a change to the marriage law, it is because the language of those advocating it has been so emotive that the contrary case can't be heard above the noise?
Could it really be said that a civil disagreement has taken place? I would like to make the case for traditional marriage as being between one man and one woman; but to do so with some important qualifications.
Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice. The revisionist case has not provided a clear and reasonable definition of marriage beyond saying that if two people want to call their relationship by that name, they should be able to by choice.